Paris Workshop on Strategic Management
ESCP Europe, University Paris-Dauphine and Sorbonne Business School
May 17th, 2019
IAE de Paris Sorbonne Business School
8 bis rue de la Croix Jarry
The first edition of this research Workshop on Strategic Management was held in 2017 at ESCP Europe.
The second edition was jointly organized by ESCP Europe, University Paris-Dauphine, and Sorbonne Business School, and was held at University Paris-Dauphine.
This third edition will take place at IAE de Paris, Sorbonne Business School.
Registration is free but mandatory. (registration not available yet)
Places are limited.
Download the program (yet to come)
9:00 – 9:30 am : Registration and Welcome Coffee
9:30 – 9:45 : Welcome Remarks
9:45 – 11:00 am : SESSION I
Nicolai Foss (U. Bocconi)
« Employees Behaving Badly: How Opportunism Differs Across Hierarchical Forms (and How to Handle It) »
While opportunism is a central behavioral assumption in transaction cost economics (TCE), its role in causing hierarchical failure is still unclear. Adding insights from organizational theory and goal-framing theory to TCE, we further the understanding of opportunism in hierarchies by introducing four types of opportunism: 1) financial, 2) status, 3) effort, and 4) visceral opportunism. Moreover, we argue in the first set of propositions that different types of opportunism are more likely under different hierarchical forms (U-form, M-form and project matrix form) because each hierarchal form systematically brings specific common dominant goal frames to the forefront of organizational members’ minds, leading to different types of opportunistic behaviors. In the second set of propositions, we contend that different governance mechanisms need to be deployed to address the different types of opportunism under each hierarchal form.
11:00 – 11:30 am : Coffee Break
11:30 am – 12:45 pm : SESSION II
Magali Delmas (UCLA) with Olivier Gergaud, KEDGE Business School
« Sustainable Practices and Wine Quality: Is There Value in Certification? »
More and more wineries are using third-party eco-certification, such as organic or biodynamic certification, to communicate their sustainable practices. At the same time some wineries are adopting sustainable practices without third party certification. In France for example, some wineries self-proclaim themselves “Viticulture Raisonnée” (reasoned viticulture), a flexible approach to sustainability devoid of the rigidity of third party certification. The presence of these different sustainable practices raises the question of their comparative value. While previous research estimates that third party eco-certification leads to increased quality as evaluated by experts, it is unknown whether non-certified sustainable practices are also associated with quality improvements. Evaluating the impact of non-certified sustainability practices on quality is challenging due to the difficulty of identifying such practices. In this paper, we use French data on experts’ quality ratings from Gault Millau, Gilbert Gaillard and Bettane Desseauve, to compare the ratings of self-proclaimed sustainable wines to third party eco-certified wines and conventional wines. A total of 140,690 wines is analyzed. Preliminary findings based on different matching techniques indicate that self-proclaimed sustainable wines are of lower quality than conventional wines, while eco-certified wines are of higher quality than conventional wines. This suggest that non certified practices could be associated with greenwashing.